• Pakistan sports minister threatens India with sport boycott
• Indian officials say visa concerns were behind IPL rejections
South Asia’s latest cricket spat went political today as the governments of Pakistan and India engaged in a bout of diplomatic mud-slinging following the exclusion of Pakistani players from the forthcoming Indian Premier League.
None of the 11 Pakistanis on offer were selected at last Tuesday’s IPL player auction – even though several were part of the squad that won last year’s World Twenty20 championship – triggering a wave of indignation.
Today Pakistan’s sports minister, Aijaz Jakhrani, condemned the “humiliating” affair and threatened to boycott other sporting events between the two countries. A parliamentary delegation pulled out of a visit to New Delhi as the speaker of parliament, Fehmida Mirza, spoke of a “planned conspiracy”.
Pakistani television coverage of the story was awash with outrage. Among those excluded was the flamboyant all-rounder Shahid Afridi who, paradoxically, featured prominently on IPL advertising billboards in India.
But Indian cricket officials said the Pakistan players were rejected over fears that their visas could be revoked amid continuing tensions between the two countries – cross-border exchanges of fire erupted in disputed Kashmir earlier this week – while the Indian government insisted there was no political hand in the rejection.
“The government has nothing to do with the IPL,” said the Indian foreign minister, SM Krishna. His ministry issued a statement urging Pakistan to “introspect on the reasons which have put a strain on relations between India and Pakistan”.
Pakistani analysts agreed the players may have fallen foul of a combination of bad politics and cold financial logic. “It’s a hard business decision,” said Osman Samiuddin of cricinfo.com. “The clubs were worried the Pakistani players might get visas this year but not the next. If that happens they lose their investment.”
What is not clear is why the Pakistanis were allowed to proceed to auction: according to some Indian reports it had been clear for several days that the IPL would shun them.
The former Pakistan Test player Aftab Gul said he was sure “some level” of pressure had been exerted on Indian clubs. But he said the principal fault laid with the Pakistan Cricket Board, which has come in for frequent criticism over its management of the game. “It’s all very easy to blame Indians. When there’s no rain, sugar or wheat, they are the bogeyman. But I’d like to take stock of what’s happening in Pakistan. Our cricket is in tatters,” he said.
Cricket has long been hostage to diplomatic relations between the two countries. International fixtures have been suspended, sometimes for decades, due to outbreaks of war in 1965, 1971 and 1999.
But cricket has also been used as an icebreaker. In 2005, the then president Pervez Musharraf took advantage of a fixture in New Delhi to advance peace talks with his Indian counterpart, Manmohan Singh, in an episode that became dubbed “cricket diplomacy”.
Now, though, relations are at a low again. The November 2008 Mumbai terrorist attacks, which caused India to cancel a planned tour of Pakistan one year ago. As seen in the latest row, what happens in south Asian politics inevitably spills on to the cricket pitch.